Evidence led

What the research says – honestly

The most convincing approach isn’t to label every technology “scientifically proven”. Instead, we say what was measured in horses, under what conditions – and where the evidence is still weak.

Szárga ló szeme közelről

Summary

Strength of evidence by technology

TechnologyWhat has been studied in horsesStrength
Cold + compressionReduced tendon temperature; greater cooling than ice boots or cooling without compressionstronger
Active cooling after workFaster drop in body temperature compared with passive reststronger
Low-level laserReduced back pain, back muscle tension and trunk stiffness (randomised, no placebo)moderate
PEMF / BEMERSigns suggestive of relaxation; recovery benefit not confirmed; small uncontrolled back study with favourable changespreliminary
LED red/NIRResearched area, few and mixed equine datalimited

Most of these studies are small. The devices and parameters used in research are not necessarily the same as ours, so results cannot be guaranteed for every horse.

Key findings

Numbers measured in horses

−10.8 °C

Core temperature of the superficial digital flexor tendon with compression cooling (60 min), compared with −7.5 °C for ice boots. 6 horses, experimental study.
McCarthy, Ordóñez, Semevolos, 2025

−10.2 °C

Maximum drop in superficial digital flexor tendon temperature with 20 min cooling + intermittent compression, versus −1.65 °C without compression. 6 horses.
Jacobs, O’Neil, Prange, 2022

61 horses

Randomised clinical trial: low-level laser therapy was associated with significant reductions in back pain, hypertonicity and trunk stiffness.
Haussler, Manchon, Donnell, Frisbie, 2020

Sources

Scientific publications cited

  1. McCarthy RD, Ordóñez HJ, Semevolos SA. In vivo effects of cold therapy and bandaging on core temperatures of equine superficial and deep digital flexor tendons. Veterinary Surgery. 2025;54(3):470–477. doi:10.1111/vsu.14235
  2. Jacobs CC, O’Neil E, Prange T. Efficacy of a commercial dry sleeve cryotherapy system for cooling the equine metacarpus. Veterinary Surgery. 2022;51(7):1070–1077. doi:10.1111/vsu.13847
  3. Takahashi Y, et al. A comparison of five cooling methods in hot and humid environments in Thoroughbred horses. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science. 2020;91:103130. doi:10.1016/j.jevs.2020.103130
  4. Haussler KK, Manchon PT, Donnell JR, Frisbie DD. Effects of low-level laser therapy and chiropractic care on back pain in Quarter Horses. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science. 2020;86:102891. doi:10.1016/j.jevs.2019.102891
  5. Dai F, Dalla Costa E, Giordano A, et al. Effects of BEMER® physical vascular therapy in horses under training: a randomized, controlled double blind study. Research in Veterinary Science. 2022;144:108–114. doi:10.1016/j.rvsc.2022.01.017
  6. King MR, et al. Effects of a bio-electromagnetic energy regulation blanket on thoracolumbar epaxial muscle pain in horses. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science. 2022;111:103867.
  7. Millis DL, Bergh A. A systematic literature review of complementary and alternative veterinary medicine: laser therapy. Animals. 2023;13(4):667. doi:10.3390/ani13040667
  8. Hyytiäinen HK, Boström A, Asplund K, Bergh A. A systematic review of complementary and alternative veterinary medicine in sport and companion animals: electrotherapy. Animals. 2023;13(1):64. doi:10.3390/ani13010064

How we communicate

How do we talk about effects?

How we put it

  • “may help support recovery”
  • “as a complementary part of rehabilitation”
  • “in a study in horses, researchers measured…”
  • “fits into the veterinary plan”

What we don’t say

  • “cures”, “rebuilds”, “eliminates”
  • “prevents injuries”
  • “removes toxins / lactic acid”
  • “guaranteed better performance”

Questions about the evidence?

We’re happy to tell you what we think about your horse’s situation – including if we think our service isn’t the answer.